KEIR STARMER was at pains to point out that his General Election victory wasn’t inevitable.

On the other hand, I was first told back in 2019 that Starmer would become the next Labour Prime Minister – and have heard that message repeated many times since.

At first, I was slightly perplexed. For within a few months Labour went into a General Election they had a reasonable chance of winning under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn.

At that point Starmer was part of Corbyn’s shadow cabinet as Shadow Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – ironic really as Starmer had no intention of leaving the EU, but then he was playing a far different shadow game.

I believe Starmer had long since been told he was the choice of prominent elites as a future Prime Minister and that meant his loyalties at that stage were not with Labour – or indeed the country.

As a member of the ‘shadowy’ Trilateral Commission, an organisation founded by philanthropist David Rockefeller (philanthropist, my arse_, he was committed to defying the will of the British people and instead campaign for a second referendum.

The Trilateral Commission numbers some of the very worst criminal politicians amongst its historical membership including the late George Bush senior. Funnily enough, a certain Jeffrey Epstein was also included although this wouldn’t have worried Starmer as he was well acquainted already with Jimmy Savile!

When you are the establishment’s choice, you can count on being pushed in the right direction by some of the most influential folk on the planet.

This is the way most, if not all, British Prime Ministers are ‘chosen’ – a list that certainly includes Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, David Cameron and Boris Johnson.

I mention Blair because he is very central to this story – and very central to Starmer’s government. Some would argue he is once again the real Prime Minister of this country!

Blair, you see, had a similar ptroblem as Starmer.

He knew he was in line for the big job but had an obstacle or two in front of him – not the failing Tories but from his own Labour Party.

As with Corbyn, a socialist who was rather too popular with the public for the establishment’s liking, the then Labour leader John Smith had a very real chance of being elected Prime Minister himself.

Following John Major’s surprise election victory in 1992, the polls surged in Labour’s direction.

Smith was even invited to the very influential and shadowy Bilderberg Group to see how he fitted. The answer, it seems, was not at all for after Smith vocally disagreed with their economic vision, he didn’t receive any further invites. In his place was a certain Tony Blair, the chosen one.

This is almost too blatant for words but in Blair’s autobiography – you’d be better off reading Mein Kampf – he recalls a morning in which he discussed with his ‘wife’ Cherie the premature death of John Smith and his elevation to the position of Labour leader.

A couple of points here – there was no reason to believe Smith would die early as, contrary to what many believe, he was in very good health having lost a great deal of excess weight and also Gordon Brown was next in line for the job anyway.

But, if the will of the general public are no obstacle to the ‘chosen one’ gaining office, there’s no problem removing political friends/enemies.

Smith did die prematurely in 1094, so was Tony Blair psychic?

To me, his comments bring back tragic echoes of Princess Diana – also not a noted psychic – when she predicted she would die in a car crash.

Then, with Smith out the way, Blair had a summit with Brown. I don’t know what was said but the result was a fiercely ambitious man meakly stood aside and Blair took the leadership and near certain victory at the next election in 1997.

Had Jeremy Corbyn , also a physically fit man, suddenly dropped dead of a heart attack prior to 2019, people may have started to put two and two together.

But there’s more than one way to skin a rabbit or remove a politician and Starmer and his influential friends played the longer game.

Publicly backing Corbyn as a good future Prime Minister – when he was actively plotting against him – Starmer bulldozered rather than nudged Corbyn down a road leading to his electoral destruction.

Had Corbyn stuck to his principles and the nation’s wishes and set Labour Party as implementing our exit from the European Union, it is entirely possible that he rather than Boris Johnson would have won the 2019 election.

That was known as the ‘Brexit election’ and was no more a positive vote for the Tories and Boris than this one has been for Labour under Starmer.

Many, many people still mourned the result of the 2016 referendum but a high proportion of ‘Remainers’ were now united with ‘Leave’ voters on one point: they wanted the whole thing over and done with.

So in pushing Corbyn down this route, Starmer knew election defeat was inevitable and Corbyn would stand on his sword.

So why would the establishment so urgently want Starmer rather than Corbyn as Prime Minister?

There are many reasons, not least of which was Corbyn’s stance on Israel and Palestine.

There are certain no-nos to gaining entry into number 10 and being anti Monarchy and critical of israel are two of the most obvious – The Crown, you see, created israel.

Corbyn failed both tests, Starmer was perfect.

Corbyn was denounced as an antisemite – interesting that as he has always had the closest of associations with the Jewish community – and eventually thrown out of the Labour Party altogether.

Think about that for a moment.

In 2019 Starmer thought Corbyn would make a good Prime Minister and was happy to work with him. Then a short time later he wasn’t even worthy of the Labour whip. And this was a man who hadn’t fundamentally changed.

So Starmer and his friends railroaded Corbyn out the way and in he marched into high office.

Still the plan could have gone wrong.

Anything can happen with frail human beings but everything from Boris being stabbed in the back by his own colleagues to Liz Truss’ joust with the demned economists and Sunak calling a General Election at the wrong time contributed to last Thursday’s disastrous resutt

So what happens now?

Starmer implements the vision of his backers. For more details see Agenda 2030.

Asked to choose between Westminster and Davos, the home of the World Economic Forum, Starmer instinctively said the latter.

This time he was telling the truth – and we will pay the price!

–