Instead of comparing bad outcomes (like miscarriage and stillbirths) for vaccinated v unvaccinated women they grouped all unvaccinated with those vaccinated prior to (but not during) pregnancy into a single “no doses in pregnancy” category. So, in comparing pregnancy outcomes this “no doses in pregnancy” category was used as a surrogate for “unvaccinated”.
THIS is a very interesting extract from a recent article by Norman Fenton on Substack. Norman describes himself as a ‘Professor of Risk;.
The context in which he wrote this was the recent retirement of one of Great Britain’s most decorated Olympians Dame Laura Kenny on the eve of this summer’s Olympics.
It’s important here to note what Mr Fenton is saying and what he isn’t.
He notes two things – Laura Kenny very publicly suffered a miscarriage and an ectopic pregnancy following her success at the last Olympics held in Tokyo in August 2021. The miscarriage, she subsequently told the world, occurred in November 2021.
The second point is that it was publicly announced that it was mandatory for all British athletes to receive the Covid vaccine to compete in Tokyo.
Therefore we can be all but 100 per cent certain that Laura Kenny received two doses of the vaccine a few months before her miscarriage.
Mr Fenton does not claim that the vaccine was the cause of Laura Kenny’s health issues. It would be impossible for him to know.
However what he does go on to say in the extract above is highly revealing as yet another example of how statistics have been manipulated to create an entirely false picture.
I have already pointed out many times that people who receive the vaccine are regarded officially as ‘unvaccinated’ until at least two or three weeks later.
As one of the most likely times to have a severe reaction to the vaccine, or even to die, is in the first couple of weeks, this insures against a link being created between vaccinated people and severe reactions.
Instead they are added to the list of ‘unvaccinated’, creating the false impression that those who didn’t receive the vaccine are more likely to suffer.
There was a warning even from before the vaccine rollout that it could have severe implications for pregnant mothers.
But, if Mr Fenton’s research is correct, only those who were vaccinated DURING the pregnancy itself are labelled as vaccinated.
This means a would-be mum, who has six or seven doses of the vaccine, is labelled as ‘unvaccinated’ as long as they don’t have another one during their pregnancy.
Last year I was told of tragedies occurring in Gibraltar where mums were giving birth to children with severe issues on an island where they strongly recommended pregnant women to get vaccinated.
Using the same criteria as I have described here, these can then be safely written off as happening to the ‘unvaccinated’ unless the jabs took place within the pregnancy itself.
I fear we are still only uncovering the tip of the iceberg when it comes to statistical manipulation.
My view is that it is fundamentally unsafe to believe any of the statistics on this issue presented by the authorities.
They have the best possible reason to want to hide what is really happening – their reputations, once we see the full picture, are shattered.
Brinders wake up blog 